(h/t Agape Press)

If you're a "transgender" individual who has been putting off applying for and enrolling in the MBA program at Harvard Business School, because you didn't like having to either choose "male" or "female" when creating your personal profile on HBS's web site, wait no longer!

A person looking in to enrolling in Harvard Business School's MBA program would probably begin their research by heading to HBS's home page. Upon arriving at the home page they'd quickly see a large link on the left side of the page that says "MBA Program", which takes you to this page, which has many links and information regarding HBS's MBA program.

Upon arriving at the MBA Program page, the most prominent links/buttons a user sees are two large ones on the left hand side. The first button is labeled "Create My Profile", and the second is labeled "Apply Now". A prospective student who chooses to create a profile at that point would obviously click the "Create My Profile" button, and which pops open a window to this page.

At first the profile creator looks like any other profile creator we've all filled out online dozens of times, until you get to the field where you're asked to select your gender. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but last time I checked there were only two genders - male and female. Apparently Harvad Business School believes there is now a third - "Transgender"

Come on! This isn't some sicko weird online dating/sex site. This is supposed to be a friggin' prestigious business school! Who, at this school, thought that this was a necessary addition to their profile creator? I mean, we know political correctness runs amuck at colleges all over the country, but I think this goes a bit far. "Transgender" isn't a real or legitimate thing! Some idiot who goes against God or nature (take your pick) and decides to change their sex, doesn't deserve a separate classification. It's bad enough that they expect us to accept their "new" gender, but do they really need to have their own little name for themselves, and does Harvard really need to legitimize them, as if they are some sort of third gender?

Beyond that gender option, a person creating their profile is also asked to check boxes next to the names of HBS "communities" they'd be interested in learning more about, one of which is the "Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender (LGBT)" community. While I personally find this outrageous as well, it's not to be unexpected and certainly doesn't rise to the insane level of allowing a person to identify themself as belonging to a third gender.

I'm done ranting on this, I don't think you need me to explain how ridiculous this is. If you don't get it, then you're lying. Even a liberal is smart enough to see how disgusting this is.

 

As I mentioned in my round-up of unhinged teachers last week, and Michelle Malkin had full coverage of here and here, a professor at Bellevue Community College included (wrote) the following, racially charged math question on a test:

Condoleezza holds a watermelon just over the edge of the roof of the 300 -foot Federal Building, and tosses it up with a velocity of 20 feet per second. The height of the watermelon above the ground t seconds later is given by formula h= -16t2 + 20t + 300

The question goes on to ask for answers to different parts of the word problem.

The latest is that TheSmokingGun.com has obtained the actual test. The question can be found on page 4 here. Below is a screen shot of the question specific question:

As I mentioned, via the Seattle Times, instead of firing or suspending this woman the talk is all about sensitivity training. Sensitivity training!?!?!? Please! This is all about an unhinged Bush hater, who I doubt is even a racist, but just let her Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) get the better of her. She probably added the question while she sat watching her favorite liberal news program and just couldn't help herself. She should now be helping herself to the unemployment line, but it's not surprising that it doesn't seem she'll be punished.

The college declined to release the name of the teacher who wrote the question. Floten said the teacher has apologized and requested cultural-sensitivity training.

***UPDATE***
The Independent Conservative is blogging on this, and notes that the NAACP and the rest of the usual suspects are silent on this. That is truly the most annoying part about this whole thing, I think. They would be all up in arms if it weren't Condi, but some notorious black liberal.

Others who blogged on this:
The Independent Conservative, Hard Starboard, What If?, , The Shadow of the Olive Tree, The Chief Brief, Right Voices, Right Voices Again

 

***SCROLL FOR UPDATES***

When it comes to news on liberal lunacy on college and high school campuses, this week has been one to remember. The following is a compilation of stories about nutty professors and teachers that have severe cases of Bush derangement syndrome and the disease of liberalism.

Recently Ward Churchill and David Horowitz appeared on Hannity & Colmes, following a debate between the two men. Churchill continued to hate on America and Hannity, though not very tactfully, further exposed what an idiot this guy is. Churchill even pretended to not be able to hear at one point. Obviously Churchill doesn't dare step in to the studio to have a realt debate, but Horowitz appeared this week in a follow-up. Follow the links for videos via Expose the Left.

If you aren't familiar with Ward Churchill, Wikipedia has some information here (thought it doesn't delve too deeply in to his hatred for America). Basically this guy called the innocent people who were killed in the WTC towers on 9/11 "little Eichmanns". He's also lied about being of a particular Native American decent. Lat I heard there isn't evidence that he's Native American at all, despite this being how he's identified himself.

Our next contestant is Dolores Huerta. I know, who? Though not a teacher, apparently she's a cofounder of the United Farm Workers Union, and some kind of big deal in the area of supporting illegal immigrants. Tucson High School invited her to speak at a voluntary assembly, which turned out to be not so voluntary. Huerta launched in to hate speech against Republicans right off the bat:

Mon-Yee Fung says, "It was just basically a hate speech. She said just downright 'Republicans hate Mexicans,' and then she repeated it again, 'Republicans hate Mexicans,' and, right away, that really, really hurt me."

Mon-Yee apparently asked to leave a number of times, but teachers refused to let her. It has also been reported that during the voluntary assembly, nonattending students were supposed to go to the library, but it was locked! Mon-Yee is set to speak to law makers about the matter. One State Representative, Jonathan Paton has already taken note (via KVOA):

Next Thursday, State Representative Jonathan Paton, a Republican from Tucson, plans to hold a hearing about the speech.

Paton says, "We don't want our high schools to turn into what our universities have been, which is basically a place of nothing but political advocacy."

Mon-Yee Fung and State Rep. Paton both appeared on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the matter in a very revealing segment. Expose the Left comes through with the video of the Factor segment in which O'Reilly plays the audio of Huerta repeating "Republicans hate latinos" during the speech. Is this what high school education has become? Local channel KVOA has video of their news segment on this as well. You can check out Huerta's web page, with contact information here.

Next, this is kind of old news so I'll just link you to a search on Expose the Left for all the video and audio goodness on the Bush hating Colorado high school teacher Jay Bennish, who compared President Bush to Hitler. One of the nutjob's students, Sean Allen, recorded and released the tape of the unhinged teacher's rants. Bennish was temporarily suspended, but quickly reinstated. Follow that link to see many segments on O'Reilly, H & C, etc. on the Bennish matter.

Michelle Malkin has the scoop on our next guest, one Steve White. White is an 8th grade science teacher at West Limestone High School in Alabama and a Democratic candidate for the District 4 seat on the House of Representatives. HIs behavior makes it clear he's not suited for either position. Perhaps being such an whatcked out lib he deserves a place in the highest ranks of the DNC though. Athens Alabama's The News Courier has the story here.

What happened was White found it appropriate to show an internet filmstrip put together by some Bush haters that repeatedly calls the President and many other Republicans "@$$holes", to his 8th grade science class. (I must have been sick that day during biology, I missed the "Clinton is an @$$hole" internet video). Michelle Malkin first clued me in to the story here, in a post that she linked to the "filmstrip" which (as much as I hate to send them even more traffic) can be viewed here. Beyond the obvious outrage, I'm outraged that the thing isn't even remotely funny or creative. This isn't as a Republican, but as a consumer of humor (why did I hear Jesse Jackson's voice in my head as I typed that?)

The Decatur Daily is reporting that White is on paid administrative leave, and that there more allegations against him have come to light:

According to parents, the current investigation is into new allegations that White made students say "John Kerry rocks" before leaving his class and showing other inappropriate material such as an animated Internet clip about former President Bill Clinton that had sexual content.

While obviously all the truth should come out, I think the original incident is enough to make him unfit to be a teacher and he should be fired immediately unless he's denying showing the "filmstrip", in which case it should be investigated. But it doesn't seem like he's denying it. Governor Bob Riley has taken note, and I hope pressures the school to fire White if they don't act on their own.

Expose the Left has video of White's opponent for the State Rep. seat, incumbent Micky Hammon, appearing on Hannity & Colmes to discuss the matter. Hammon seems like a soft spoken non-mudslinger type, but Hannity sort of forces him in to admitting that there is no action short of of firing that would be appropriate for White. Hammond didn't want to make it a political issue and seem like he was using it to leverage himself, but it's kind of hard when you've got such a cut and dry matter so he of course had to agree that White doesn't belong in the classroom. Even Alan Colmes says that White should be fired. Check the H & C segment out here. Michelle Malkin also has an update.

I won't even try to add to Malkin's coverage of the UC Santa Cruz troop haters. She's been on top of it from the beginning and has all you need to know. A quick summary though... basically a bunch of radical far left nuts at UC Santa Cruz drove military recruiters from the campus in a show of good ol' fashioned liberal tolerance, including all the usual scarf and hood wearing types. Check out the Malkin posts here, here, and here. The latest is that, citing the Solomon Ammendment, many are calling for a cut-off in tax money that the school receives, which reached approximately $80 million last year.

Another fully Malkinized story this week was that an unnamed Bellevue Community College professor used a math problem where "Condoleezza" throws a watermelon. Of course we all immediately wonder, "what if they had said "Al Sharpton" or "Jesse Jackson" or any other prominent black liberal? Can you imagine the rallies? You know the the shakedown brothas would be there speaking in rhymes about racism in America today, reparations, and of course how George Bush opresses blacks. But we don't see any of that because this is Condi, a Bush lady.

Here's the original math problem, that others have seen and realized that not only is the professor a racist, but an idiot:

Condoleezza holds a watermelon just over the edge of the roof of the 300 -foot Federal Building, and tosses it up with a velocity of 20 feet per second. The height of the watermelon above the ground t seconds later is given by formula h= -16t2 + 20t + 300

a. How many seconds will it pass her (she's standing at a height of 300 feet) on the way down?

b. When will the watermelon hit ground?

As I said, Michelle Malkin has been all over this one from the get go as well, and her coverage can be found here and here. In the most recent update Michelle points to this Seattle Times article, that tells us what action has been taken:

The college declined to release the name of the teacher who wrote the question. Floten said the teacher has apologized and requested cultural-sensitivity training.

The name was actually changed to Condi's from the original writing of the math problem. One might be able to play dumb had it been a name like Jim or something, but not when it's Condoleezza;

The test question was originally written with the name of a comedian, Gallagher, whose signature shtick was to smash a variety of objects, often watermelons. Later, the question was rewritten, and the name was changed to Condoleezza, Floten said.

Another big hat tip goes out to Michelle Malkin on this next one. Norther Kentucky University Professor Dr. Sally Jacobsen encouraged her students to destroy an anti-Abortion displayed, titled "Cemetary of Innocents", and then joined in the fun to destroy with them. In this photo, courtesy of Sarah Loman of The Northerner Online, you can see Jacobsen taking out expressing her liberal tolerance on the display.

The Northerner has further coverage and photos of the tolerance festival.

The original article that Malkin links to is from NKY.com, in which Jacobsen offered no comment on her participation, other than admitting to "inviting" the students to destroy the display.

"I did, outside of class during the break, invite students to express their freedom-of-speech rights to destroy the display if they wished to," Jacobsen said.

Asked whether she participated in pulling up the crosses, the professor said, "I have no comment."

She said she was infuriated by the display, which she saw as intimidating and a "slap in the face" to women who might be making "the agonizing and very private decision to have an abortion."

I don't think Malkin and others noticed the headline on the story though, which I found a little odd. Could be just my liberal media conspiratorial mind, but doesn't "Abortion display destroyed", seem like an odd headline for a story about a pro-life/anti-abortion display being destroyed by abortion supporters? I think most people, when scanning over that headline, would assume that it means some rabid pro-lifers destroyed a pro-abortion display. Am I right?

Of course all of these stories come on the heels of the story of Eric Pianka, the University of Texas professor who reportedly called for the extermination of 90% of the human population. Apparently Pianka requested that the speech not be videotaped, so the only thing we have is hearsay, but this isn't a new position so it shouldn't be so "shocking" that we don't believe it. There is a large segment of the population who believe so strongly that we are overpopulated that we need to take the world's population down to between a couple hundred million to 1 billion (depending on who you talk to.)

The main one to push the story has been Forrest Mims III, a member of the Texas Academy of Science, chairman of its environmental science section and editor of the Citizen Scientist. Mims first reported it at the Citizen Scientist, after personally attending the speech in question. I normally don't like to copy huge excerpts, but for those who don't click through the link, I found it necessary in this case:

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.

This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka's strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter.

Pianka hammered his point home by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”

Pianka then began laying out his concerns about how human overpopulation is ruining the Earth. He presented a doomsday scenario in which he claimed that the sharp increase in human population since the beginning of the industrial age is devastating the planet. He warned that quick steps must be taken to restore the planet before it's too late.

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world's population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We've got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.” So the oil crisis alone may require eliminating two-third's of the world's population.

Apparently the audience gave him an approvingly enthusiastic round of applause after the speech. Then came question and answer time:

The audience laughed when he said, “You know, the bird flu's good, too.” They laughed again when he proposed, with a discernable note of glee in his voice that, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

Read the full report here. It seems this isn't a new speech for Pianka. He's been giving it to his students for a number of years, and while some may have found the "eliminate 90%" stuff to be a little crazy, most of his students gave him glowing reviews, even saying they "worship" him. World Net Daily has more on all of this as well.

Pianka hasn't spent much time trying to clarify or defend himself other than to say that he was issuing a warning, rather than a threat. If Mims tells an accurate story, then Pianka's excuse is bogus.

Of course the story spread like wildfire on the internet, and many blogs picked it up. I had been meaning to post on it for a while, but it would require too much research to include all what I wanted to include. You see, this isn't just one nutjob, it's a movement. The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) seems committed to these causes. You can take my word for this or not, because the pages have been taken down, but there are many quotes from UN officials advocating extreme reductions in population. Of course if human life is the enemy, death is the cure, so the motives turn in to a desire to kill a huge majority of the population.

UNFPA and the UN may have taken down and hidden a lot of quotes that their people have made over the years, but they are actually carrying out their agenda on a smaller scale as we speak. From aiding in China's forced abortions to delivering "family planning" packages in mass to third world countries that include abortion inducing pills and manual suction devices for do-it-yourself abortions. The Population Research Institute and LifeSite have a lot more on UNFPA's shady activities. I would suggest doing your own research, beyond just those two sites, to see what you believe. As I said, without the pages that have been taken down, you might understandably deem me a conspiracy theorist, which I kind of think about myself when I begin to wonder about AIDs, Africa, eugenics, the racist eugenics believer Margaret Sanger who founded what is now Planned Parenthood.

This site has some quotes from major players on the world stage on the need (according to them) for population reduction. I have been unable to verify them for myself, but considering stuff that I have read in past years, they don't surprised me.

And if you think there aren't people out there openly supporting reducing the population, think again. First off, UN folks and similar types openly say that we're overpopulated without a second though. But some groups exist for the sole purpose of reducing the population, such as Negative Population Growth. NPG believes thatthe optimal population for the United States is 150 to 200 million and that the optimal world population is two to three billion. They seem to be a pretty active group. Another population reduction group is the UNFPA supporting, Scientists for Population Reduction, Inc, who state, among other things, in their policies:

We would like to see the day when an unwanted pregnancy is as matter-of-fact to a woman as catching a cold. She simply goes to the drug store and takes something for it.

Another would be the Sierra Club. The policies of The Sierra Club are openly all about population control. This is only scratching the surface of this scary world/movement. Again, do your own research, and check in to the material deeper within those few sites to see what they're all about.

The extreme left espouses many of the "global warming" (more on that dogma that seems to get further debunked by the day) and "overpopulation" UNish views. This same extreme left has gained a lot of power in the American Democratic party. I'm not saying that they're all evil or party of a grand conspiracy, but consider these things next time you head to the polls. Think about what views certain politicians share with the UNFPA types.

I hope you've enjoyed this collage of far left nutty professors, and have learned a little more about the state of education in this country. It's gone from math, U.S. history, and science to Bush is an @$$hole, Bush is Hitler, you need to die to better the world, and destroy the displays of anything you don't agree with.

Linkfests and Open Trackbacks:
Samantha Burns, Point Five, 7 Deadly Sins, NIF, Right Wing Nation, The Uncooperative Blogger, Stuck on Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Adam's Blog, Stop the ACLU, TMH's Bacon Bits, Wizbang, Church and State, Blue Star Chronicles, Third World Country, The Liberal Wrong Wing, Pirate's Cove, Gribbit's Word, Publius Rendezvous, Cao's Blog, Rhymes with Right, bRight & Early, Basil's Blog, Linkfest Haven

***UPDATE***
A big thanks to Ian at Expose the Left for the link to this post, as well as to Sister Toldjah who has her own great roundup of links to similar stories. And of course another big thanks to Expose the Left and Michelle Malkin for all the great posts and video that allowed me to create this clearinghouse for this week's nutty indoctrinators educators.

 

h/t Michelle Malkin

I don't even want to post the image on my blog because it's so disgusting, but The Sheaf, a student newspaper at the University of Saskatchewan who wouldn't run the Mohammad images, had no problem mocking Jesus in a much more disgusting way. I think we've all see the hypcrisy with the rest of the media running wild with Abu Graib photos, but pixelating Mohammad images, most of which weren't even "Mohammad" images, and most of those that were, weren't even negative (unless you count the ones faked by the Imams who got the whole thing started.) But for a paper to run such a sickening cartoon portrayal of Jesus, while refusing to run the mild Mohammad images is just another example of the insanity that passes for normal on college campuses. This is of course Canada, but it isn't much better here. Actually as you probably know this week Hannity has been all over the story of Yale letting a Taliban member cut in line to get in.

Anyway, if you think you can handle the Jesus mocking cartoon they ran, check it out via Michelle Malkin

Now, for those of you who went and looked at it.... What should be done? Should we burn embassies anywhere we find them? Should we end the NHL and burn the players on a pile of maple trees? Should we hold Celine Dion hostage? Actually that last one would be our own torture.

No, you won't see anything like that, nor should you... But wait, hasn't the left blamed all the death and destruction that followed the publishing of the cartoons (that everyone knows was just an excuse for the violence these people crave to exhibit), on "incitement"? Everytime someone who isn't white/christian/Republican does something beyond reproach the "incitement" excuse comes out. All these Muslims were "incited" turn burn down dozens of embassies and kill hundreds of people simply because some cartoons were printed in Denmark. The 600 mostly black youths in Toledo were "incited" to destroy a neighborhood where less than two dozen neo-Nazis had scheduled (but never held) a rally.

Anyway, despite the fact that there are plenty of good reasons for having gone to Iraq (Clinton named most of them here, including why Iraq when others had WMDs too.), can't George Bush, using liberal logic, silence critics by claiming "incitement" by 9/11? And then likewise, shouldn't Christians terrorize the world over this cartoon and blame "incitement" and the media and everyone could then blast the paper, rather than us if we burn embassies and murder hundreds of people who have nothing to do with the cartoon?

This is just exhibit 14678-B9X of anti-Christian bias that largely gets a pass in the Americas and the world today. So you libs can keep screaming "phony" war on Christmas etc., and claim things are isolated incidents, but they just keep piling on, eventually they aren't so isolated anymore.

Small Dead Animals has full coverage of this shameful situation.

Other Blogger Reax:
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, The Theocrat, Verum Serum, Leather Penguin, Alarming News, Deborah Gyapong, Sister Toldjah, Black Sheep Press

 

hat tip: Fox & Friends, on the Fox News Channel, but NewsMax and The New York Sun both have articles you can check out.

The specific incident where the other students called Marine student Matthew Sanchez a "baby killer" and because he was a minority, "ignorant" and "fodder" for the military, actually occured last fall. The story is back in the news because student veterans are trying to do something about it.

Here's the NewsMax article that sums up the situation. It's shorter than the Sun article, so I've just posted the entire thing.

A group of Columbia University students who are military veterans is meeting with the university’s provost to discuss charges of anti-military bias at the school.

Allegations of anti-military discrimination first surfaced last September when student Matthew Sanchez claimed he was verbally attacked for being in the Marine Corps.

Sanchez said three students accosted him at the Military Society table at the school’s annual activities fair and called him a "baby killer.”

They also said that as a member of a minority group, he was "ignorant” for letting himself be used as "fodder” for the military, the New York Sun reported.

After that incident, the military students group conducted a survey of veterans, reservists and servicemen’s dependents.

The survey revealed that "a surprising number of students that are veterans feel vulnerable, feel that their opinions are stifled, and feel that they cannot fully embrace their culture,” student Oscar Escano, who served with the Army in Afghanistan, told the Sun.

He told of a "permissive atmosphere” in which anti-military bias and comments, mostly by students but also by professors, are common.

The meeting with Provost Alan Brinkley will be the first step toward reducing anti-military bias at the university, according to Escano.

He would like to see Columbia expand and enforce its discrimination policy, which he said is now limited to protecting "Vietnam-era or disabled veterans.”

Students surveyed also included those enrolled in an ROTC program at another school.

Columbia banned the ROTC in 1969 amid anti-Vietnam War protests, and its students currently enroll in ROTC programs at Fordham University and Manhattan College.

As recently as May 2005, the university’s senate voted not to bring the ROTC program back to the campus.

I'm so sick of college libs pulling this kind of crap. I'm also sick of the media ignoring it, but I'm not surprised. Seriously though, what's with "tolerant" liberals these days? They have to name call and throw tantrums about EVERYTHING. For the last time, get your people to connect with the American people and maybe they can get elected and do what you want them to. In the mean time be civil, especially to the veterans who's sacrifice allows you to live your little elitist lifestyles.

I'd rather not rant on this much more, because there isn't a whole lot to be said. These libs are simply disgraceful. Sadly these are the types that control the Democratic Party today, even though most Dems would try to call them the fringe.

 

I don't know that this is the proper method for achieving the stated goal here, but it shines light on the problem at the very least. I'm not sure what would be the best way to tackle this issue, but I think the general public needs to become more aware of what is going on in colleges across the country.... ppppsttt, it ain't just Ward Churchill or some other story you might hear about on O'Reilly. It's a culture of far left dogmatic behavior that permeates the campuses of virtually every major university in the country.

excerpt from Reuters via Yahoo! News.

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A conservative alumni group dedicated to "exposing the most radical professors" at the University of California at Los Angeles is offering to pay students $100 to record classroom lectures of suspect faculty.

The Web site of the Bruin Alumni Association also includes a "Dirty Thirty" list of professors considered by the group to be the most extreme left-wing members of the UCLA faculty, as well as profiles on their political activities and writings.

Doing a quick search, I found a related story from a couple years back on CNSNews.com.

Students at the University of Texas started a Professor Watch List. This seems like a more legit way to expose these professors, but I wonder if it really does any good. The mainstream media doesn't want to hear about their buddies getting busted, so they won't talk about it, and the professors aren't going to change because there is no real pressure to when they are so in control anyway. Such a consolodation of power that we might hear Hillary say that our universities are run like "plantations", no? "And YOU know what I'm talkin' about!"

Do you want these folks as professors for sons and daughters?