« Weekend at Castro's? Some Think Fidel Fotos Are Fauxtos... | Main | All Egyptian Students Rounded Up. Why Were They So Scattered? »

A-hole-madinejad Starts His Own Blog! Free Virgins For First Liberal To Blogroll Him!

(h/t HotAir)

Holy suicide bombs, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has started his own blog!!! If you look to the right side of the page you'll see 4 flags. Click the second from the left for his English translation.

Interesting points - Right now he has a poll question: "Do you think that the US and Israeli intention and goal by attacking Lebanon is pulling the trigger for another word war?"

Of course Hitler2000 means "world war", but what's funny is I answered "no" and I was surprised to be in the majority (53 to 47). I suspect this is due to conservative blogs, mockingly linking to him. Otherwise he's got to feel like a real ass if people who go there as "fans" vote against his premise.

So far, I have a couple criticisms for Mr. A's blog. I don't like his comments being held for monitoring. I asked him why he's such an a-hole, and still don't see my comment showing up. So then I used the comment box at the side, which I guess is for sending a message (rather than commenting on a post) and told him he's a huge douche. I can't wait to see if I get a reply.

 

TrackBack

| TrackBack URL

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.rightwinged.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/540

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A-hole-madinejad Starts His Own Blog! Free Virgins For First Liberal To Blogroll Him!:

» Hacked Xxx Passwords linked with Hacked Xxx Passwords
Free Beastiality Porn Free Beastiality Porn [Read More]

Comments

For some reason the trackback will not work....

Hilarious....(LOL)

My apologies on the trackback issue Suzie. Not sure what the problem is, but you're not the first to encounter it. Glad you enjoyed the post.

The "first liberal" to blogroll him?

As I have said numerous times before, this isn't an issue of liberals vs. conservatives, as there are plenty on the Left who support warfare and interventionism. And there are many of us on the Right who oppose these policies.

But the President of Iran isn't a liberal. He is a neoconservative.

But the President of Iran isn't a liberal. He is a neoconservative.

Riiiiiiight. Just like Hitler was a right-wing Christian conservative too, right? And not at all a socialist and a huge fan of Darwin who wanted to eliminate Jews not on religious grounds, but on racial grounds, and who had a distain for Christianity which was even repeated (about him) by his top dogs.

I'm not saying (nor did I say) that Ahmadinejad is a liberal, but to call him a conservative (in an effort to compare him to what a "conservative" means in America) is just stupid.

Look, the point is this guy is a terrorist supporter and funder who wants to wipe Israel of the map. Modern liberals are terrorist appeasers who think talking will help. Liberals generally also see Israel as the evil ones in the mideast conflict. The left was also giddy over getting to see the real Ahmadinejad during the Wallace interview. Lefty bloggers used the interview to essentially say "he's not that bad of a guy, just misunderstood".

Again, I never claimed Ahmadinejad was a liberal... but the blame America first left will practically embrace anyone if they think that the right hates them.

To clarify: I was not saying (nor did I say) that Ahmadinejad is a conservative... I was saying that he is someone who believes in a neoconservative geopolitical philosophy (by Iranian standards, he is considered a neoconservative) .

And I was not narrowly referring only to the U.S. 'versions' of conservatism, liberalism, and neoconservatism... Political and economic theories, and schools of political thought, are present worldwide.

Aakash 8:16:

But the President of Iran isn't a liberal. He is a neoconservative.

Aakash 11:44:

I was not saying (nor did I say) that Ahmadinejad is a conservative

Whatever you say. Anyway, you still didn't address the point. While I think it's clear you did call him a conservative, I certainly NEVER called him a liberal, and never implied anything of the sort (see unnecessary explanation above).

Post a comment