(partially cross-posted at Expose the Left)
***SCROLL FOR UPDATES***

So I get out of the shower and see if Drudge has anything that I missed, and I see a picture of one decent looking chick and another regular chick (see here) above the headline - Supporters of Lebanon protest outside Israeli consulate in NY.... But when I click the headline I'm taken to this Reuters photo in one of Yahoo! News' photo slideshows:

The caption attached to the photo (just in case they decide to change it):

Supporters of Lebanon protest outside the Israeli consulate in New York, July 18, 2006. REUTERS/Chip East (UNITED STATES)

These are supporters of Lebanon? Where is there a sign about Lebanon in that whole lot? One of the signs I see reads:

"ALLAH (swt) WILL DESTROY THE TERRORIST STATE OF ISRAEL"

Below the text is a burning Israeli flag with the Star of David morphed with a swastika. Additionally we can see that the bottom of the sign says "______ Society". We can't make out the words before "society", but I'd be awfully interested to know what society this is.

The other sign we see is worse than the first. It shows a big picture of the White House and in giant black letters simply states:

ISLAM WILL DOMINATE

Excuse me a moment, I have to make a call...

(button pushing noises, followed by ringing)

NSA: Hello, NSA?
Randy: Hey, I just emailed you a link to a photo of some suspicious characters who are walking around NYC (where a large part of 9/11 took place) holding signs of the White House and saying that Islam will dominate. Can you check that out, and keep an eye on these guys? Maybe tap a few phones or at least watch the records, and follow some banking transactions?
NSA: Let me take a look at my email sir... Okay got it!
Randy: You see the picture?
NSA: Yeah... I don't know what we can do about this though... I mean, if we track this guy, the left will sue for racial profiling and attacking free speech... You know, because someone will leak what we're doing.
Randy: Yeah, the leaks suck... But screw the left, your job is to protect us.
NSA: You're right, we'll do what we can and pray for now leaks... It's too bad that the left in this country loves free speech for terrorists and their sympathizers over anyone else, and wishes we would be attacked before we act...
Randy: It's also too bad that liberal media idiots like Reuters calls these people "supporters of Lebanon" when it's clear they are nothing more than Islamofacists.
NSA: Yup. Anyway, I'll pass this on the the appropriate department. Thanks.
Randy: Thank you. Bye.

Okay, that got stupid because I lost my train of thought when I had an actual phone call, but you get my point. First, that Reuters is really a POS for calling these people "supporters of Lebanon", when first of all their signs don't even come close to reflecting that, and second their signs are blatantly and unambigously Islamofacist in nature! Unless Reuters can show me an Arabic translation where "Islam Will Dominate" means "I Support Lebanon", they are again siding with the terrorist point of view. F U Reuters.

***UPDATE***
Michelle Malkin has updated a post she wrote earlier on the virtual Hezbollah infiltration of America, now adding pictures including the one that is the subject of this post, though she found it at Gateway Pundit.

Gateway Pundit has a handful of other pictures of equally outrageous, yet expected signs. Also thanks to GP, I now know what that "society" I mentioned earlier is - The Islamic Thinkers Society. Looks like covering the insanity over there would require an entirely separate blog, so I'll set that aside for the time being.

Additionally, Michelle Malkin links us to photos from everyone's favorite internet watchdog photographer, "Zombie". Zombie snapped shots at a rally in San Francisco last Thursday, which actually had some people from both sides. Guess which side behaved with civility and respect, and which side acted like a bunch of deranged animals?

My favorite part is when we see a photo of the terrorist sympathizers adjusting their kaffiyeh-masks, using the reflection of a window, are interrupted by a couple of police officers. The masked men try to say that they weren't planning to do anything violent, to which one cop replied:

"Then why are you dressing up like a terrorist like that?"

Classic!

Bryan at HotAir links to Zombie as well, eerily saying “They’re heeeere.”

***UPDATE***
Malkin has a new post up entitled "More Support For Israel", in which she includes a link to me! It isn't the first time she's linked to me, but one of very few times and for a little blogger like myself I feel pretty honored. Thanks Michelle.

By the way, earlier I forgot to link to Michelle's latest column at the Jewish World Review entitled - "Hezbollah is already here", in which she destroys your false sense of security you feel when you think Hezbollah is on the other side of the world.

Oh, and I also wanted to make note of what Hezbollah's spokesman said yesterday, sense there was all but a media blackout on it. At least we have blogs and WND:

"We have 2,000 volunteers who have registered since last year," Hezbollah spokesman Mojtaba Bigdeli told Reuters yesterday. "They have been trained and they can become fully armed. We are ready to dispatch them to every corner of the world to jeopardize Israel and America's interests. We are only waiting for the supreme leader's green light to take action. If America wants to ignite World War III … we welcome it."

Can you hear me now? Consider that before you brush off the people we see holding these signs as some harmless fringe loons. Loons they may be, but harmless and few in number they are not.

*****UPDATE*****
Some low-life lefty blogger TBogg, who I had never heard of, but is apparently pretty popular has spun (what, dishonesty from a liberal?!) my post to act as if it was about me looking for "internets babes", based on my brief joking mention about the two girls in the photo displayed on Drudge. Incase anyone else had trouble interpreting what the post was about, and what the mention of the "chicks" had to do with it, below is the response I added to TBogg's comments:

Hey, way to totally ignore the point of my post genius. Well, what should I expect from liberals who are incapable of honesty.

The part about the chicks was barely a blip/mention that had absolutely nothing to do with the point. The "chicks" part was more for a chuckle as I totally busted Reuters on their lie.

If anyone cares to check out the real post, it has nothing to do with wanting to see chicks and being disappointed when I saw Islamofacists. Only a simple liberal or one deliberately being dishonest (shocking!) would think that.

I clicked the link at Drudge to see what the story was. The link, oddly, was just going to a slideshow of images, rather than an actual story, and for some reason lands you on pic #308, which was odd considering that Drudge used a different image on his page above the link.

Now that I've broken that down for you geniuses, HERE'S THE ACTUAL POINT OF THE POST, IF YOU HAD CHOSEN TO READ IT!

Reuters refers to these men as "supporters of Lebanon". Why? Not one sign in the picture says anything about Lebanon. It doesn't even have the far left/arab talking points "end the occupation"... No, these are Islamofacists who's signs say "Allah Will Destroy the Terrorist State Israel" above a burning Israeli flag with the star of david morphed with a swastika, and the other sign has a photo of the White House and says "Islam Will Dominate"

What the hell does "Islam Will Dominate" and Allah destroying Israel has to do with supporting Lebanon. Reuters wouldn't even have been accurate to simply call them Hezbollah supporters, because in fact they are supporters of Islam dominating the world. NOTHING TO DO WITH LEBANON, ALL TO DO WITH ISLAM TAKING OVER THE PLANET!!!

But enjoy yourself quoting part of a post out of context and treating it like it has anything to do with the true subject of the post. I expect no better of folks on your side of the aisle.

I couldn't care less about some terrorist supporting hos standing on an Israeli flag. They're clearly idiots, and have no clue how they would be treated if they were in their motherland, by the types of people they are demonstrating in support of. The mention of them is, as I said, partly a joke, and mainly about how it was odd that Drudge linked to a separate image in the photo slideshow, when the one he displayed is part of the same slideshow.

More:
Blogs of War, Texas Rainmaker, Homemade Sin, Sister Toldjah, Assorted Babble, A Blog For All, California Conservative, Macsmind, Riehl World View, Captain's Journal, It Shines For All, Liberty and Justice, Old War Dogs, Freedom for Some, Wallstreet Café, The Lunch Counter, 4 The Little Guy, Partisan Times, Hyscience