I'm a little confused about this story, because I was told that Republicans are all a bunch of racist rich white guys. You know Democrats are shameless panderers the party for "the black man" who's goal it is to get votes by making promise after promise, but keeping minorities poor so they can continue the promises to score votes in the next election help out the little guy, so this Newsday story couldn't possibly be true, could it?

With a record of calling minorities inferior by lowering standards and pushing affirmative action leveling the playing field and throwing oreos and racial epithets, as well as creating racist photoshops welcoming the debate from black Republicans and through the leadership of people like former Ku Klux Klan member civil rights activist Robert Byrd, how could anyone believe that there are any Democrat racists, especially when we know that only Republicans are racists. I demand a retraction Newsday!

Okay, now that I've run out of sarcasm, here's the deal... A Democratic candidate for Alabama attorney general is denying the holocaust and prancing around the country, speaking for racist organizations. And here's the real shocker..... He's an atheist!!!

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- A Democratic candidate for Alabama attorney general denies the Holocaust occurred and said Friday he will speak this weekend in New Jersey to a "pro-white" organization that is widely viewed as being racist.

Larry Darby concedes his views are radical, but he said they should help him win wide support among Alabama voters as he tries to "reawaken white racial awareness" with his campaign against Mobile County District Attorney John Tyson.

Give us a history lesson Mr. Darby

Speaking in an interview with The Associated Press, Darby said he believes no more than 140,000 Jewish people died in Europe during World War II, and most of them succumbed to typhus.

Historians say about 6 million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis, but Darby said the figure is a false claim of the "Holocaust industry."

"I am what the propagandists call a Holocaust denier, but I do not deny mass deaths that included some Jews," Darby said. "There was no systematic extermination of Jews. There's no evidence of that at all."

Darby said he will speak Saturday near Newark, N.J., at a meeting of National Vanguard, which bills itself as an advocate for the white race. Some of his campaign materials are posted on the group's Internet site.

"It's time to stop pushing down the white man. We've been discriminated against too long," Darby said in the interview.

You know, I don't like programs that discriminate against whites by "level the playing field" and the fact that there are racial quotas to be met in many workplaces. All of these kinds of activities are racist (not "reverse" racism), against whites. Racism, is racism. Further, they're racist againts the blacks and minorities they claim to be on the side of. Democrats are in favor of lowering education standards to help minorities get through school. They're all about giving them an edge for getting in to college (quit often for free) when more qualified whites are getting bumped. These and related platforms are racist in that they tell minorities "you're to dumb or incapable to make things happen for yourself, so we're going to hand everything to you... Vot fore me!"

While I believe all of what I just said, I don't think anyone is "pushing down the white man" as this Democrat says. He's clearly an off the wall racist. My view that I share with many conservatives, is a difference of policy opinion. We think you should work hard to achieve goals, not have the government hold your hand and tell you that you need them. But that's hardly the same as essentially shouting "white power" like this guy.

Let's learn a little more about Darby. You know, what really makes him tick:

Darby, founder of the Atheist Law Center and a longtime supporter of separation of church and state, said he has no money for campaign advertising and has made only a few campaign speeches.

Tyson said aside from his views on race and the Holocaust, Darby also has publicly advocated legalizing drugs and shooting all illegal immigrants.

Legalizing drugs has been a liberal platform for some time, but shooting illegals? Wow, again, aren't Republicans who want to secure the border the racists? I'm curious why none of the massive illegal immigrant protests haven't shown up at his door. Oh yeah, because he has a big blue "D" on his mailbox.

Anyway, I'm curious. Why aren't headlines reading "Duo Denies Holocaust Happened", in reference to this guy and Iranian President Ahmadinejad? That's a ridiculous suggestion, isn't it liberals? Well they did it when they spun Pat Robertson's words about Ariel Sharon's health to something that still didn't closely match Ahmadinejad's comments. Articles were all about this "duo" launching attacks on Sharon. See this post for all the background you need.

At the time the media was obsessed with comparing Pat Robertson to Ahmadinejad, I was curious why they didn't call Kerry and Bin Laden a "duo". Some of the comments from those two men have been almost identical, especially when compared with the ridiculous pairing of unrelated comments of Robertson and Ahmadinejad. Not to mention the fact that everytime a terrorist tape gets released, it's like they downloaded the DNC talking points right in to their teleprompter.

For more fun with "Democrats emulating terrorists" (or visa versa), check out this video (vie Expose the Left) of MSNBC's Scarborough and Carlson laying it all out for you. You could also play my (joke) match game "who said it", or watch "The Odd Couple".

We could get in to a whole historical thing about who's the real racists, who was, who still is, etc. But the main angle I wanted to go here was the media double standard. Why isn't this the same type of headline news? Robertson isn't even an elected official or running for office, this guy is! Where's his "duo" headlines?

***UPDATE***
I forgot to add this little point earlier. This guy is an atheist, right? Is it then safe to assume that he subscribes to the theory of evolution? Why then is he campainging for a job that deals with the law? Not get what I'm driving at? Our laws, like it or not, are loosely and originally based on the 10 commandments. Even if you somehow were to disagree, you'd have to agree that "law" is unique to human beings. But as an atheist and evolutionist (again that part is my assumption) you believe we are simply a more highly evolved animal. Why then do we have laws? Why can't we run around humping people's legs? Why can't we steal, kill people, or rape without repercussions? After all, we're just animals, and have no accountability to God, right?

It is clear that morals, and the knowledge of the difference between right and wrong is uniquely human, and clearly a gift from God. Either that or I missed the latest episode of "Judge Judy: Chimp Edition". The point is, why am I accountable to society (if we are to accept evolution)? I'm just an animal, I should be able to satisfy my primal urges, whatever they may be, and no one should get in my way, unless their own urge happens to be to kill or cause harm to me. Laws of the jungle, right?

The point is, how can we put people in a position that is based all around legal matters, when his own beliefs essentially tell him that there is no right and wrong. Yeah, he can claim to want to uphold the law. But why? What if I don't like that law? I'm an animal without morals who doesn't answer to some higher power, so why should any laws bind me?