When it comes to news on liberal lunacy on college and high school campuses, this week has been one to remember. The following is a compilation of stories about nutty professors and teachers that have severe cases of Bush derangement syndrome and the disease of liberalism.

Recently Ward Churchill and David Horowitz appeared on Hannity & Colmes, following a debate between the two men. Churchill continued to hate on America and Hannity, though not very tactfully, further exposed what an idiot this guy is. Churchill even pretended to not be able to hear at one point. Obviously Churchill doesn't dare step in to the studio to have a realt debate, but Horowitz appeared this week in a follow-up. Follow the links for videos via Expose the Left.

If you aren't familiar with Ward Churchill, Wikipedia has some information here (thought it doesn't delve too deeply in to his hatred for America). Basically this guy called the innocent people who were killed in the WTC towers on 9/11 "little Eichmanns". He's also lied about being of a particular Native American decent. Lat I heard there isn't evidence that he's Native American at all, despite this being how he's identified himself.

Our next contestant is Dolores Huerta. I know, who? Though not a teacher, apparently she's a cofounder of the United Farm Workers Union, and some kind of big deal in the area of supporting illegal immigrants. Tucson High School invited her to speak at a voluntary assembly, which turned out to be not so voluntary. Huerta launched in to hate speech against Republicans right off the bat:

Mon-Yee Fung says, "It was just basically a hate speech. She said just downright 'Republicans hate Mexicans,' and then she repeated it again, 'Republicans hate Mexicans,' and, right away, that really, really hurt me."

Mon-Yee apparently asked to leave a number of times, but teachers refused to let her. It has also been reported that during the voluntary assembly, nonattending students were supposed to go to the library, but it was locked! Mon-Yee is set to speak to law makers about the matter. One State Representative, Jonathan Paton has already taken note (via KVOA):

Next Thursday, State Representative Jonathan Paton, a Republican from Tucson, plans to hold a hearing about the speech.

Paton says, "We don't want our high schools to turn into what our universities have been, which is basically a place of nothing but political advocacy."

Mon-Yee Fung and State Rep. Paton both appeared on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the matter in a very revealing segment. Expose the Left comes through with the video of the Factor segment in which O'Reilly plays the audio of Huerta repeating "Republicans hate latinos" during the speech. Is this what high school education has become? Local channel KVOA has video of their news segment on this as well. You can check out Huerta's web page, with contact information here.

Next, this is kind of old news so I'll just link you to a search on Expose the Left for all the video and audio goodness on the Bush hating Colorado high school teacher Jay Bennish, who compared President Bush to Hitler. One of the nutjob's students, Sean Allen, recorded and released the tape of the unhinged teacher's rants. Bennish was temporarily suspended, but quickly reinstated. Follow that link to see many segments on O'Reilly, H & C, etc. on the Bennish matter.

Michelle Malkin has the scoop on our next guest, one Steve White. White is an 8th grade science teacher at West Limestone High School in Alabama and a Democratic candidate for the District 4 seat on the House of Representatives. HIs behavior makes it clear he's not suited for either position. Perhaps being such an whatcked out lib he deserves a place in the highest ranks of the DNC though. Athens Alabama's The News Courier has the story here.

What happened was White found it appropriate to show an internet filmstrip put together by some Bush haters that repeatedly calls the President and many other Republicans "@$$holes", to his 8th grade science class. (I must have been sick that day during biology, I missed the "Clinton is an @$$hole" internet video). Michelle Malkin first clued me in to the story here, in a post that she linked to the "filmstrip" which (as much as I hate to send them even more traffic) can be viewed here. Beyond the obvious outrage, I'm outraged that the thing isn't even remotely funny or creative. This isn't as a Republican, but as a consumer of humor (why did I hear Jesse Jackson's voice in my head as I typed that?)

The Decatur Daily is reporting that White is on paid administrative leave, and that there more allegations against him have come to light:

According to parents, the current investigation is into new allegations that White made students say "John Kerry rocks" before leaving his class and showing other inappropriate material such as an animated Internet clip about former President Bill Clinton that had sexual content.

While obviously all the truth should come out, I think the original incident is enough to make him unfit to be a teacher and he should be fired immediately unless he's denying showing the "filmstrip", in which case it should be investigated. But it doesn't seem like he's denying it. Governor Bob Riley has taken note, and I hope pressures the school to fire White if they don't act on their own.

Expose the Left has video of White's opponent for the State Rep. seat, incumbent Micky Hammon, appearing on Hannity & Colmes to discuss the matter. Hammon seems like a soft spoken non-mudslinger type, but Hannity sort of forces him in to admitting that there is no action short of of firing that would be appropriate for White. Hammond didn't want to make it a political issue and seem like he was using it to leverage himself, but it's kind of hard when you've got such a cut and dry matter so he of course had to agree that White doesn't belong in the classroom. Even Alan Colmes says that White should be fired. Check the H & C segment out here. Michelle Malkin also has an update.

I won't even try to add to Malkin's coverage of the UC Santa Cruz troop haters. She's been on top of it from the beginning and has all you need to know. A quick summary though... basically a bunch of radical far left nuts at UC Santa Cruz drove military recruiters from the campus in a show of good ol' fashioned liberal tolerance, including all the usual scarf and hood wearing types. Check out the Malkin posts here, here, and here. The latest is that, citing the Solomon Ammendment, many are calling for a cut-off in tax money that the school receives, which reached approximately $80 million last year.

Another fully Malkinized story this week was that an unnamed Bellevue Community College professor used a math problem where "Condoleezza" throws a watermelon. Of course we all immediately wonder, "what if they had said "Al Sharpton" or "Jesse Jackson" or any other prominent black liberal? Can you imagine the rallies? You know the the shakedown brothas would be there speaking in rhymes about racism in America today, reparations, and of course how George Bush opresses blacks. But we don't see any of that because this is Condi, a Bush lady.

Here's the original math problem, that others have seen and realized that not only is the professor a racist, but an idiot:

Condoleezza holds a watermelon just over the edge of the roof of the 300 -foot Federal Building, and tosses it up with a velocity of 20 feet per second. The height of the watermelon above the ground t seconds later is given by formula h= -16t2 + 20t + 300

a. How many seconds will it pass her (she's standing at a height of 300 feet) on the way down?

b. When will the watermelon hit ground?

As I said, Michelle Malkin has been all over this one from the get go as well, and her coverage can be found here and here. In the most recent update Michelle points to this Seattle Times article, that tells us what action has been taken:

The college declined to release the name of the teacher who wrote the question. Floten said the teacher has apologized and requested cultural-sensitivity training.

The name was actually changed to Condi's from the original writing of the math problem. One might be able to play dumb had it been a name like Jim or something, but not when it's Condoleezza;

The test question was originally written with the name of a comedian, Gallagher, whose signature shtick was to smash a variety of objects, often watermelons. Later, the question was rewritten, and the name was changed to Condoleezza, Floten said.

Another big hat tip goes out to Michelle Malkin on this next one. Norther Kentucky University Professor Dr. Sally Jacobsen encouraged her students to destroy an anti-Abortion displayed, titled "Cemetary of Innocents", and then joined in the fun to destroy with them. In this photo, courtesy of Sarah Loman of The Northerner Online, you can see Jacobsen taking out expressing her liberal tolerance on the display.

The Northerner has further coverage and photos of the tolerance festival.

The original article that Malkin links to is from NKY.com, in which Jacobsen offered no comment on her participation, other than admitting to "inviting" the students to destroy the display.

"I did, outside of class during the break, invite students to express their freedom-of-speech rights to destroy the display if they wished to," Jacobsen said.

Asked whether she participated in pulling up the crosses, the professor said, "I have no comment."

She said she was infuriated by the display, which she saw as intimidating and a "slap in the face" to women who might be making "the agonizing and very private decision to have an abortion."

I don't think Malkin and others noticed the headline on the story though, which I found a little odd. Could be just my liberal media conspiratorial mind, but doesn't "Abortion display destroyed", seem like an odd headline for a story about a pro-life/anti-abortion display being destroyed by abortion supporters? I think most people, when scanning over that headline, would assume that it means some rabid pro-lifers destroyed a pro-abortion display. Am I right?

Of course all of these stories come on the heels of the story of Eric Pianka, the University of Texas professor who reportedly called for the extermination of 90% of the human population. Apparently Pianka requested that the speech not be videotaped, so the only thing we have is hearsay, but this isn't a new position so it shouldn't be so "shocking" that we don't believe it. There is a large segment of the population who believe so strongly that we are overpopulated that we need to take the world's population down to between a couple hundred million to 1 billion (depending on who you talk to.)

The main one to push the story has been Forrest Mims III, a member of the Texas Academy of Science, chairman of its environmental science section and editor of the Citizen Scientist. Mims first reported it at the Citizen Scientist, after personally attending the speech in question. I normally don't like to copy huge excerpts, but for those who don't click through the link, I found it necessary in this case:

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.

This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka's strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter.

Pianka hammered his point home by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”

Pianka then began laying out his concerns about how human overpopulation is ruining the Earth. He presented a doomsday scenario in which he claimed that the sharp increase in human population since the beginning of the industrial age is devastating the planet. He warned that quick steps must be taken to restore the planet before it's too late.

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world's population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We've got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.” So the oil crisis alone may require eliminating two-third's of the world's population.

Apparently the audience gave him an approvingly enthusiastic round of applause after the speech. Then came question and answer time:

The audience laughed when he said, “You know, the bird flu's good, too.” They laughed again when he proposed, with a discernable note of glee in his voice that, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

Read the full report here. It seems this isn't a new speech for Pianka. He's been giving it to his students for a number of years, and while some may have found the "eliminate 90%" stuff to be a little crazy, most of his students gave him glowing reviews, even saying they "worship" him. World Net Daily has more on all of this as well.

Pianka hasn't spent much time trying to clarify or defend himself other than to say that he was issuing a warning, rather than a threat. If Mims tells an accurate story, then Pianka's excuse is bogus.

Of course the story spread like wildfire on the internet, and many blogs picked it up. I had been meaning to post on it for a while, but it would require too much research to include all what I wanted to include. You see, this isn't just one nutjob, it's a movement. The UN Population Fund (UNFPA) seems committed to these causes. You can take my word for this or not, because the pages have been taken down, but there are many quotes from UN officials advocating extreme reductions in population. Of course if human life is the enemy, death is the cure, so the motives turn in to a desire to kill a huge majority of the population.

UNFPA and the UN may have taken down and hidden a lot of quotes that their people have made over the years, but they are actually carrying out their agenda on a smaller scale as we speak. From aiding in China's forced abortions to delivering "family planning" packages in mass to third world countries that include abortion inducing pills and manual suction devices for do-it-yourself abortions. The Population Research Institute and LifeSite have a lot more on UNFPA's shady activities. I would suggest doing your own research, beyond just those two sites, to see what you believe. As I said, without the pages that have been taken down, you might understandably deem me a conspiracy theorist, which I kind of think about myself when I begin to wonder about AIDs, Africa, eugenics, the racist eugenics believer Margaret Sanger who founded what is now Planned Parenthood.

This site has some quotes from major players on the world stage on the need (according to them) for population reduction. I have been unable to verify them for myself, but considering stuff that I have read in past years, they don't surprised me.

And if you think there aren't people out there openly supporting reducing the population, think again. First off, UN folks and similar types openly say that we're overpopulated without a second though. But some groups exist for the sole purpose of reducing the population, such as Negative Population Growth. NPG believes thatthe optimal population for the United States is 150 to 200 million and that the optimal world population is two to three billion. They seem to be a pretty active group. Another population reduction group is the UNFPA supporting, Scientists for Population Reduction, Inc, who state, among other things, in their policies:

We would like to see the day when an unwanted pregnancy is as matter-of-fact to a woman as catching a cold. She simply goes to the drug store and takes something for it.

Another would be the Sierra Club. The policies of The Sierra Club are openly all about population control. This is only scratching the surface of this scary world/movement. Again, do your own research, and check in to the material deeper within those few sites to see what they're all about.

The extreme left espouses many of the "global warming" (more on that dogma that seems to get further debunked by the day) and "overpopulation" UNish views. This same extreme left has gained a lot of power in the American Democratic party. I'm not saying that they're all evil or party of a grand conspiracy, but consider these things next time you head to the polls. Think about what views certain politicians share with the UNFPA types.

I hope you've enjoyed this collage of far left nutty professors, and have learned a little more about the state of education in this country. It's gone from math, U.S. history, and science to Bush is an @$$hole, Bush is Hitler, you need to die to better the world, and destroy the displays of anything you don't agree with.

Linkfests and Open Trackbacks:
Samantha Burns, Point Five, 7 Deadly Sins, NIF, Right Wing Nation, The Uncooperative Blogger, Stuck on Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Adam's Blog, Stop the ACLU, TMH's Bacon Bits, Wizbang, Church and State, Blue Star Chronicles, Third World Country, The Liberal Wrong Wing, Pirate's Cove, Gribbit's Word, Publius Rendezvous, Cao's Blog, Rhymes with Right, bRight & Early, Basil's Blog, Linkfest Haven