The Sheaf couldn't bring themselves to say it. PBS Watch can. See This Is What They Meant to Say

But is it 'really' kosher'?I think the little pig is lying.

dude, you make the lamest and most pointless comments... again, I'm never in the habit of deleting comments... but just go get you're own blogspot blog or something because I'd rather have no comments than the idiotic things you have to say

I'm sorry do you want me to be infuriated?Stupid cartoon that wasn't even funny or meaningful and you have a whole article dedicated to it.But good call on taking Celine Dion hostage.And you know what the irony is with the picture of mohammed with a bomb in his turban?He looks like a Sikh Indian not a muslim.By the by muslims and Sikhs hate each other.

well if he looks like a Sikh, I'm not sure what all the fuss is about (of course by fuss I mean burning of embassies and murdering of hundreds of people, mainly Christians, who had nothing to do with the cartoons)

Um... did you read post? It's not about the cartoon, it's about the undeniable hypocrisy of this paper, and the fact that this won't cause Christians to burn and murder everything in site. The "entire" thing isn't dedicated to the cartoon, it's dedicated to the story surrounding the event. I'm not the only one talking about it... "Real" newspapers are on it too

http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=99d5b011-144a-4d32-8f18-c0f46174b468&k=98990

Again, you come on with some lame joke, but have nothing to say about the situation...so why do you bother?

Who really cares what some newspaper from a Canadian college publishes or doesn't publish.The front page news is most likely about a kegger of Molsen at the pi kappa pi house on Friday night.I just can't wait until Iran publishes the cartoons mocking the holocaust.Lets see how many mainstream newspapers run those.Then the fun begins.

The concern is that due to the current climate, it has become accepted to mock Christianity only... Just like black people can call you "white boy" and make stereotypical jokes... It's a disturbing double standard. This cartoon may be worse than most, but it's only a drop in the bucket of this sort of anti-Christian campaign that exists everywhere now. But don't for a second dare offend a Muslim. Christians will sit take it, non-violently like they always do, but everytime a Muslim decides Allah wants him to kill and destroy, the left who is all to happy to attack Christianity, will defend the violence because of some sort of "incitement". Again, do you have the comprehension level of a 5 year old? I just explained to you how it's not about a single cartoon in so stupid paper, it's about the issues that surround it... remember, I just barely said:

Um... did you read post? It's not about the cartoon, it's about the undeniable hypocrisy of this paper, and the fact that this won't cause Christians to burn and murder everything in site. The "entire" thing isn't dedicated to the cartoon, it's dedicated to the story surrounding the event. I'm not the only one talking about it... "Real" newspapers are on it too

http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=99d5b011-144a-4d32-8f18-c0f46174b468&k=98990

Well next time we invade a Christian country and bomb em back to the stoneage we'll make sure not to offend their deity.

Bravo, I've seen liberals divert and ignore the issue before... but you're really takin' the cake here bud... You keep commenting as if you're replying, yet you're not at all replying to anything I said... I really (seriously) think you ought to look in to getting some help. You're either extremely stupid or a tad insane...

You've repeatedly diverted the issue and I've repeatedly said it's about the hypocrisy, double standards, "incitement" excuses for one side, etc. etc. etc. Your last comment is just beyond being an idiotic response, and has nothing to do with the issue being discusssed here. Like I said, you should read over your comments (to other posts, not just this one) and seriously consider what might be wrong with your comprehension skills and get an assessment from a trained professional. I've seen libs like this before, but you're even a little more off balance than what I've encountered.

Now if you have anything to say about the actual issue at hand and not more diverting and off topic comments or idiotic unrelated jokes, feel free... Otherwise, as I said another time, go on over to blogspot (it's free!) and get your own blog where you can make insane comments as if they are arguments to unrelated issues, and have a great time doing it.

Your going on and on like its some mainstream press.Why don't you get upset when Foxnews question of the day is whether or not civil war in Iraq could possibly be good for the country?Its a Canadian College newspaper.Who cares?Obviously no one besides you.

again you've diverted the whole issue.. seriously, take a look in the mirror. You're insane dude, literally. Either that or you have absolutely nothing to say so your using the other classic liberal move which is to just spend time annoying people on blog comments by acting like an idiot, just to do it.

Okay, I haven't said it's the mainstream press.. How many times do I have to repeat it's not about this specific media outlet... but the surrounding issues. I'm going to ask you AGAIN, have you even read the post and my replies to your insane and idiotic comments? Again, if you have something to say that has anything to do with the, fine... but clearly you have absolutely nothing of any substance to add, and you haven't even attempted to make it seem like you do. You repeatedly complain about me making an issue out of a small college paper, and I repeatedly explain, only to be ignored again, that it's not about that. READ before you reply or leave... "no one besides" me? I provided you a news link! But again, that is just to satisfy your diversion, and not the point. Seriously dude, I'm not at all kidding when I tell you to seek help.

by the way, don't think I didn't notice your classic liberal diversion tactic (AGAIN!) where you blab about Fox News... I'm just not going to dignify it with a response because that is exactly what you want.. drag the issue off topic when you have nothing else to say.

The issue is your 'moral'outrage over what a Canadian college publishes.It is self supporting and not even American so let me know when you got some actual meat.If you get upset over some obscure colleges publishing habits why don't you get pissed when Bill O'Reilly pulls facts and figures out of his ass?And don't say he doesnt cause I'll flood this board with only his outright lies not his questionable stuff.Wheres your outrage?Oh yeah you like what he says so it doesn't matter.

So Rob, you're admitting that you have absolutely nothing to say, and can't read, correct? How many times do I have to explain to you that it's not about this paper, but the larger issue and related issues?

Seriously, I'm asking you, are you admitting now that you either can't read or are at least a little insane?

By the way, how do you not feel like an idiot when I keep busting you for diverting the issue, and you just keep on doing it. Even if I were to go off on your O'Rreilly tangent and even if you had a point... How would that relate to this in any way? The issue here has nothing to do with any "facts and figures".... (Again, I know you won't, but read the post and my replies to find out what it is about.)

The larger issue being what?That Christians around the world didn't take to the streets over an obscure cartoon in some Canadian college newspaper?I wouldn't have known about it without you,and I can bet the rest of the world doesn't know and wouldn't care if they did.Christians pride themselves on pacifism but muslims don't.They spread the religion 'by the sword' so it should come as no small shock that they have a tendency to be touchy and easily pissed off.AntiChristian sentiments is nothing new so really,who cares?And isn't there a war on Christmas you gotta get out there and fight?

Well at least you seem to have read it this time... But you're missing a lot of the point....

There is a larger picture... The American media goes wild with Abu Graib photos, but wouldn't show the Mohammad images... Why? Not out of fear of offending Muslims, because the ONLY thing that can be gained from new Abu Graib photos is angering Muslims to attack our troops, etc.

I've already gone over the double standard with the "incitement" excuse from the left... Maybe you just don't have a problem with that? Or maybe you're just admitting that there is nothing you can possibly say to justify the double standard.

But I'm not sure what your goal is here. Other than diverting to things about O'Reilly or ignoring all points that were outlined to continue complaining about how this is "just" some college paper. You did however, sarcastically mention the war on Christmas. Well this ties in to that actually.... It's actually a broader world war on Christianity... We see a trial in Italy courts to deny that Jesus existed, we've got double standards like this small one that happen on an international level day after day, year after year... You've got ACLU groups doing the most insane things, even going as far as to try to change the name of Las Cruces, NM because that means "The Crosses"...

But still, what are you contributing here. The story is, as I've said, the double standard of this paper that refused to run the Mohammad images. The fact that violent Muslims around the world used those stupid cartoons as an excuse to murder and burn, and the left around the world and in this country excused the bahavior with the old "incitement" line, and the American media was too scared to run the cartoons, all while running "newly released" Abu Graib photos, etc.

I don't want to go on because you don't care about the actual issue, you care about diverting this to whether O'Reilly (who has nothing to do with this) tells the truth, and about how small the paper is.

As I said, either say something that is relevant or just stop, I literally think you are insane. I know you probably think I'm just saying that, but I'm not. Read the comments from beginning to end.... How could I come to any other conclusion than that you're either insane, can't read, or can't comprehend?

lol, by the way:

AntiChristian sentiments is nothing new so really,who cares?

Yeah, wars are nothing new either... who cares... (insert virtually any issue here) isn't new either.. who cares... No one should ever utter a word because nothing is really "new" so we should all just sit here and not discuss anything we care about. Right Rob?

lol, you are truly a nutcase. That is some logic bud. I bet you seriously have no clue why AntiChristian sentiments is nothing new so really,who cares? is such a stupid thing to say, do you?

Whether or not Muslims burn and pillage their own cities over some Danish cartoon doesn't bother me.Its their own cities.I never gave them a free ride about it.I think theyre ridiculous in expecting Denmark to limit their free press and issue a formal apology.Now if the Mohammed cartoons were reprinted in other newspapers isn't the case as I have seen them via the mainstream media.Now the Washington post or the New York times etc. displaying any form of antichristian satire is hypothetical as they haven't nor do they make it a staple of their journalistic standards.If it became world news that a satire of Jesus performing oral sex on a pig you can guarentee it would be printed from worldwide as it would be 'news' and people would want to see what all the hubub is about much like the Mohammed cartoon(which was much funnier,I still don't get the jesus cartoon other than its mere shock value)When you raise a black flag to issues like this you make it more popular.Look at everytime the Catholics boycott something.It becomes the newest must see in the world and thus defeat their original purpose.Just ignore it and roll on.Its the price you pay for a free press.

well, at least that time you put together thought out comment... I still don't think it's addresssing the point about double standards and the fact that anti-Christian attitudes in the media are accepted, but no one dares offend any other religion. There is plenty of anti-Christianity out there and it's just accepted because we don't attack as a result, and as the majority we're just expected to take it and always cater to the minority who are the only ones allowed to cry racism/bigotry/prejudice/etc. There is a disturbing growing anti-Christian movement in the world, and specifically in this country, and most don't see it... Many do, but most don't. You may not agree, but as someone who does believe it's happening (removal of ten commandments, ACLU hating on Christianity, but defending NAMBLA, trying to change names of towns that are too Christian "sounding", etc. etc.) I think this little story and example of a double standard and hypocrisy shines a little light on the larger issue.

Well once again...its Canada so trying to say that antichristian sentiments in America are too intense in the media you might want to first build your case with something stronger than some obscure Canadian college as your starting point,unless your aim is to build a strawman to easily knock down.Its your blog so feel free to get flabbergasted cause lord knows no one else is.

Yeah, so then you can nitpick all the known evidence... If you don't already know about the attacks on Christianity, then it's because you're choosing not to. It's no secret, and I'm not acting as if I'm the first one to realize this so this post is breaking it. I know you know this, and now want it to be all about what you try to make it all about... Don't come around here talking about strawmen when you have the most ridiculous uninformed, kool aid, diversion posts that truly reach shocking levels of stupidity and insanity. If you really need some examples to start you off go read Gibson's book... This isn't supposed to be some post that blows the doors off something we all (those of us who are being honeset) already know.... No offense but basically I just don't want to spend the time digging up every little example so you can, as yet another diversion, argue whether you think each example is legit or not... Especially given your history... You constantly ignore replies and keep repeating your same BS.. Why would I then spend time digging up all this information, knowing that you'll likely just completely ignore it anyway?

Like I have insinuated,Christianity prides itself on martrydom.Cant you just be happy that people nitpick at it knowing that you and only you and your select few know the truth?It keeps with the martyr theme.Just look at the manner in which Jesus died and look at your whining.See any parellels?Didn't think so.

And dont confuse me for 'Antichrist' vs. antichristian.I have nothing but respect and awe for the manner in which jesus lived.Are you aware there is a newfound book of Judas that is on its way to publication?Its written in Coptic Egyptian and was bought by some university in Basel,Switzerland(by the way a BEAUTIFUL city,been there twice)They are working out a French,English and German translation and should come out within the next year if according to plan.You think the bible will be revised to accomodate his story?Historians seem to think it will profoundly affect the gospel.

Divert, divert, divert... Either say that you support the double standard, or the "incitemenet" excuse or shut up dude... You never say anything related to the actual posts or respond when I repeatedly ask you if you're insane because you'll ask questions over and over that have been repeatedly answered. Seriously, get help you nutcase.

I hate to even get drawn in to your diversion, but I just looked up a bit about this book of Judas... looks like it was written at least 100 years after Judas by gnostics...

Divert,divert,divert?Lt your readers decide.Your far too much of an interested party.

Let my readers decide? That would be a thing to say if you were actually talking about any of the issues raised, but you seem to deliberately go to each post and say things that are totally unrelated and off topic like it's your job.. Why are you so obsessed with my blog? Go start your own where you can be as off topic as you want and make insane one line comments that make no sense at all. I told you I don't like to ban people, but you're becoming too much of a pest and I may be forced to.

yeah it would be real difficult creating a new psudonym.

I can ban IPs pinhead

If you searched my IPS you would find that I am in Landstuhl,Germany.The largest military hopsital in Europe is where I work.Yeah thats right,I am military.Just too shocking huh.Go ahead,search my IPS.

Many of us soldiers are tired of people like you living vicariously through us a form of machismo that makes you feel proud and full of bluster and its left to us to live up to it.I'm a medic and our motto is 'trained to heal not to kill'

As surprising as I find it, I am inclined to take your word on that. Your IP does originate in Germany, though it says it Bayern... Which looking at a map doesn't appear to be in the vicinity of Landstuhl... But I don't know.

Either way, if you are in fact military, thanks for your service. But that still doesn't have anything to do with anything, and was only another diversion. I say if you don't start actually making coherent on topic comments, I may be forced to ban you for cluttering my blog up with all your mess... Thinking you're slick you come back with a comment about coming up with a new pseudonym (dragging it further off topic) to which I'm forced to explain the ability to ban IPs, to which you further drag off topic by talking about where you are located.

Now, I still doubt you're military, judging by your character, but I suppose it's possible, and despite the seeming discrepancy in location, I won't argue because I don't know much about Germany.

Now when I say "judging by your character" that has nothing to do with your "ideas" or "beliefs", because you haven't really talked much about those... You've just bounced from post to post making ridiculous off topic comments, asking insane questions that I answer only to have you ignore the replies and go off on further tangents. This is a character thing, not a political view thing, and based on just what I've seen here, yours is a little off.

So undrape yourself with the American flag and give me a description of what you have done to be a good American besides fill up your SUV,shop at wal-mart and have a yellow ribbon magnetized to your gas guzzler.

Bayern is in eastern Germany or as its called in english 'bavaria' is many many many miles from here.I imagine it originates from my service being Tonline.I dont know.I am military,have been since January 2001.I am an E-5 promotable and should have my E-6 by June if the promotion points go through as hoped.

I'm going to leave your website alone as you seem like a nice enough person and not at all what I wish to mock.I just HATE rightwing ideology as it cloaks itself in Christianity which I equate to pacifism and then proceed to destroy and kill anything that gets in the way of American interests.Who Would Jesus Kill?WWJK

K, I don't have an SUV and never have... Not that I have a problem with it, but just to be clear.

And I'm not going to get in to an argument over "patriotism"... isn't it always the lefties who hate theirs being challenged? I don't believe I've questioned yours in any way?

By the way, is that a secret motto?

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22trained+to+heal+not+to+kill%22+medic&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=moz2&x=wrt

well, if you're leaving, could you at least send me a screen cap of the purple ad thing that you're seeing?

brigade motto

if you could give me a blow by blow how to take a screen shot.I only know how to capture individual photos not whole pages.

I'll take your word on it...

by the way, just saw your other reply about the ad.. yeah, if it's google it's nothing I'm in control of... Often I'll have a post bashing Hillary and the Google ads down the lefthand side will all be like "Hillary 2008" "Vote For Hillary" "Beat Bush" stuff

to take a screen shot, you can just hold down your "alt" key and hit your "print screen" key once and that basically does the same thing as "copy" something.. then you just open an image program (like paint or something) and "paste".

I actually learned that trick only a few months ago and it comes in pretty handy.

No such luck Randy,I am on a German keyboard so I don't know where the print screen key would be.Take it easy and I'm sure I'll probably pop in the closer the elections get later this year lol

..provided I'm not banned :)

cool... and if you're still interested I'm not sure if the german keyboard is the same, with just different words or whatever, but the print screen is right above "insert" which is right above "delete" (usually)

Rob wrote..." wouldn't have known about it without you,and I can bet the rest of the world doesn't know and wouldn't care if they did."

What you seem to have forgotten Rob is that the Mohammad cartoons were originally published in a DENMARK newspaper. I would bet that the rest of the world wouldn't have known about them either if the liberal-saturated main-stream media hadn't jumped on the "Islamophobia" bandwagon.

But when a cartoon that is as offensive to Christians as the Mohammad cartoons were to Muslims is published in a country just to the North us - there's no outrage, no talking heads on cable news networks screaming how "disrespectful" they are, no politicians offering their "religious tolerance" mantra.

You say, "Who really cares what some newspaper from a Canadian college publishes or doesn't publish?" What you didn't bother to find out is that several Canadian msm newspapers picked up the story also, so the cartoon wasn't just published in some Canadian college newspaper. And you wanna know who cares? I DO! And every Christian who gets a kick in the gut when we see our Lord portrayed in such a sickening manner.

And your asinine statement that "Whether or not Muslims burn and pillage their own cities over some Danish cartoon doesn't bother me. Its their own cities." just shows that you are either incredibly stupid or not nearly as informed as you try to appear.

The killing of Nigerian Christians who had NOTHING to do with publishing the Mohammad cartoons by burning them alive is a helluva lot more than just "burning and pillaging their own cities"!

Exactly Christian Pundits... I suspect that Rob didn't know about what happened in Nigeria though... The media so desperately didn't want to portray Muslims in a bad light, they barely reported the Christians killed in Nigeria, simply because they were Christian.

When it comes down to it though, does anyone believe this violence has anything to do with the cartoons? We already know the most inflamatory ones were fake anyway, and only a couple of the real ones even showed Mohammad, and mostly in a neutral way.

This is just more Muslim violence and the cartoons are just a convenient excuse. Liberals, play you intolerance card on me, I'm ready for it.